GERMANIC PHILOLOGY 2 MOD. 2
- Academic year
- 2026/2027 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- GERMANIC PHILOLOGY 2 MOD. 2
- Course code
- LM0360 (AF:560262 AR:361239)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6 out of 12 of GERMANIC PHILOLOGY 2
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- L-FIL-LET/15
- Period
- 2nd Semester
- Course year
- 2
- Where
- VENEZIA
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
- to acquire knowledge and understanding in advanced topics of Germanic Philology by being exposed to both the current theoretical debate and its applications to a specific literary genre. This knowledge and understanding will be founded upon and will extend that typically associated with the first cycle; it will also provide a basis for originality in developing and/or applying ideas, often within a research context (see below, under "Contents");
- to apply their knowledge and understanding, as well as problem solving abilities in new or unfamiliar environments within broader contexts related to Germanic Philology with particular reference to textual criticism and advanced reading skills;
- to have the ability to integrate knowledge and handle complexity, and formulate judgments with incomplete or limited information about their object of study (this is a typical situation in the philological field). The ability to formulate judgements will include reflecting on social and ethical responsibilities linked to the application of their knowledge (e.g. the educational and social impact of editions);
- to be able to communicate their conclusions, and the knowledge and rationale underpinning these, to specialist and non-specialist audiences clearly and unambiguously, using the appropriate language register;
- to acquire advanced learning skills that should allow them to continue to study in a manner that may be largely self-directed or autonomous (e.g. through individual independent reading on philological issues, as well as advanced practice exercises on theories, models and forms).
Pre-requirements
Contents
B) Discussion of specific case-studies taken from the matter of Robin Hood (medieval ballads on Robin Hood and related texts).
c) Modern rewrites
Referral texts
Holt, J.C. (1982ff.). Robin Hood, London: Thames & Hudson;
Knight, Stephen (2003ff.). Robin Hood, a mythic biography, Ithaca and London: Cornell UP.
Original texts: https://d.lib.rochester.edu/robin-hood/authors
PART C
Italian-speaking students: Buzzoni, M. (2013). L'appropriazione di una leggenda, https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/v4/it/edizioni4/libri/978-88-97735-30-4/ ; Buzzoni, M. (2023). La materia hoodiana nel contesto plurilingue e multiculturale del medioevo europeo in SPOLIA, vol. 24, pp. 55-69
English-speaking students: Cuenca, E. L., (2023) “‘Normans’ vs. ‘Saxons’: Cinematic Imaginaries of Race and Nation in Angevin England, 1938–1964”, Open Library of Humanities 9(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.9397
Assessment methods
More specifically:
- Knowledge and understanding: checked through content questions;
- Applying knowledge and understanding: checked through practical exercises, such as translations and linguistic manipulations;
- Making judgements: checked through methodological questions;
- Communication skills: checked through open questions (whether students ommunicate their conclusions clearly and unambiguously, as well as the knowledge and rationale underpinning these);
- Learning skills: evaluation of the students' autonomy of judgement.
Type of exam
The lecturer has a duty to ensure that the rules regarding the authenticity and originality of exam tests and papers are respected. Therefore, if there is suspicion of irregular conduct, an additional assessment may be conducted, which could differ from the original exam description.
Grading scale
Question 2: translation and analysis of a short text examined in class – up to 7 points.
Question 3: translation and analysis of a short passage taken from a work studied in class – up to 8 points.
Question 4: theoretical and applied aspects of rewritings – up to 9 points, with distinction.
The final mark is calculated as the sum of the partial scores.
Within each question (already weighted in terms of points), the grading is determined by the following criteria:
- knowledge of the topics covered in lectures and in the reference manuals (34%);
- ability to hierarchise information (33%);
- appropriate use of technical terminology (33%).
Teaching methods
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals
This subject deals with topics related to the macro-area "Human capital, health, education" and contributes to the achievement of one or more goals of U. N. Agenda for Sustainable Development