PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- Academic year
- 2025/2026 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- Course code
- EM3A02 (AF:567654 AR:323628)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- SECS-P/07
- Period
- 4th Term
- Course year
- 1
- Where
- VENEZIA
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
- Identify the context in which cultural organizations operate.
- Learn and discuss the steps involved in realizing a project for artistic and cultural organizations, including planning, implementation, and evaluation.
- Address potential issues and risks in project development.
- Identify and discuss challenges related to attracting, assigning, and managing resources, considering the trade-off between available resources and final objectives.
- Effectively use project management tools.
- Understand the role of the project manager in cultural organizations.
- Develop a critical perspective on project management, appreciating its virtues and shortfalls.
Pre-requirements
Contents
- Introduction to project management practices.
- Project management in the creative industries.
- The planning phase, GANTT, elements of budgeting, costing and fund raising.
- Implementation and monitoring.
- Risk management.
- The project manager.
- Critical perspectives on project management.
Referral texts
Meredith, J.R. & Mantel S.J., Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Wiley, New York. (Chapter 1-6-8)
Addis, M., & Rurale, A. (Eds.). (2020). Managing the Cultural Business: Avoiding Mistakes, Finding Success. Routledge. (Chapters 3-4-5); pp. 78 – 183
European Commission (2016), Managing Art Projects with Societal Impact. Study Book for Students, Stakeholders and Researchers; Sybellius Accademy research
Case Studies, chapters and selected papers will be communicated throughout the course, in class and on Moodle, and will be made available on Moodle.
Assessment methods
50% coursework
50% written exam
Details about the coursework will be provided during the first week of the course.
Type of exam
The lecturer has a duty to ensure that the rules regarding the authenticity and originality of exam tests and papers are respected. Therefore, if there is suspicion of irregular conduct, an additional assessment may be conducted, which could differ from the original exam description.
Grading scale
≤17 – Inadequate, fragmentary, and incomplete knowledge of the content, which is either not understood or only partially understood and reworked. Inadequate ability to reflect and present.
Sufficient
18 – Very uncertain knowledge of the content, which requires consolidation, and which is understood and reworked in a highly uncertain manner. Barely sufficient ability to reflect and present.
19 – Uncertain knowledge of the content, which requires consolidation, and which is understood and reworked in an uncertain manner. Sufficient ability to reflect and present.
20 – Sufficient knowledge of the content, which still partially requires consolidation, and which is understood and reworked in an uncertain manner. Sufficient ability to reflect and present.
Fair
21 – More than sufficient knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked with some uncertainty. Substantial ability to reflect and present.
22 – Fair knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked with some uncertainty. Fair ability to reflect and present.
23 – More than fair knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked with some uncertainty. Fair ability to reflect and present.
Good
24 – Correct knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked with some uncertainty. Good ability to reflect and present.
25 – Correct knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked with fairly good confidence. Good ability to reflect and present.
26 – Complete knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked with fairly good confidence. Good ability to reflect and present.
Distinguished
27 – Complete knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked securely. Remarkable ability to reflect and present.
28 – Complete and in-depth knowledge of the content, which is understood and reworked securely. Remarkable ability to reflect and present.
Excellent
29 – Broad and in-depth knowledge of the content, understood and reworked securely, with full autonomy and personal insights. Excellent ability to reflect and present, despite minimal imperfections.
30 – Broad and in-depth knowledge of the content, understood and reworked securely, with full autonomy and personal insights. Excellent ability to reflect and present.
Outstanding
30 e lode (30 with honors) – Very in-depth and wide-ranging knowledge of the content, understood and reworked autonomously and with personal insights, displaying complete command of terminology and an excellent capacity for interdisciplinary connections. Full ability to reflect and present.
Teaching methods
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals
This subject deals with topics related to the macro-area "Circular economy, innovation, work" and contributes to the achievement of one or more goals of U. N. Agenda for Sustainable Development