RESTORATION
- Academic year
- 2025/2026 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- RESTORATION
- Course code
- EM3A06 (AF:576589 AR:323632)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- CHIM/12
- Period
- 1st Term
- Course year
- 2
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
• Knowledge of the main materials and technical characteristics of artworks
• Knowledge of the technical and scientific vocabulary of reference
• knowledge of the principal necessity and relation between artworks and the surrounding environment
• Knowledge of the principal restoration interventions related to artistic techniques and to the state of conservation in terms of materials compatibility and reversibility.
• Knowledge of the main diagnostic methodologies applied to heritage investigation.
2. Ability to apply knowledge and understanding
• Development of visual, practical, and intellectual skills in understanding artworks characteristics and needs
• Knowing how asses and evaluate the conservation state of artifacts in comparison with their constituent materials.
• Apply the acquired competencies to the evaluation of possible interventions of restoration and conservation of artifacts.
3. Practical skills
• Capacity to apply problem-solving skills grounded in theoretical understanding and art historical research to specific treatments.
• To be able to formulate simple restoration and conservation hypotheses based on the degradation of artifacts.
• To be able to understand the needs for a proper preservation and conservation plan.
4. Communication skills
• To be able to efficiently communicate with other professionals of the sector such as curator, stakeholders, historians.
• To be able to communicate the conservation and preservation needs of artworks in relation to their environment.
• To be able to promote a conscious preservation and valorisation policy of the patrimony.
Pre-requirements
Contents
Next to a general knowledge of the main restoration interventions, attention would be paid also to the most important scientific diagnostic methodology for art restoration and preservation.
Referral texts
C. Cennini, Il libro dell'Arte (Neri Pozza, Vicenza, 2003, pp.89-178, or chapters 36-156), or The Book of the Art (English version): chapters 36-156..
O. Casazza, Il restauro pittorico nell'unità di metodologia, Nardini, Firenze, 2007.
M. Ciatti, Appunti per un manuale di storia e teoria del restauro. Dispense per gli studenti, Edifir, Firenze, 2009, pp. 263-408.
R. Marrone, Colore Pigmento Degrado, Youcanprint, Tricase (Le), 2016.
C. Brandi, Theory of restoration, Nardini, Firenze, 2005
Barker, B Des et al., Conservation Science: Heritage Materials. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2006
Artioli G. ; Angelini I., Scientific methods and cultural heritage : an introduction to the application of materials science to archaeometry and conservation science, Oxford : Oxford University press, 2010
Brunetto G. ; Miliani C. ; Sgamellotti A. Science and art : the contemporary painted surface, London : Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020
Sabbatini L. ; van der Werf Inez., Chemical analysis in cultural heritage, Berlin : De Gruyter, 2020
Matteini M et al., Chemistry for restoration : painting and restoration materials, Firenze : Nardini, 2016
Assessment methods
According to the Italian University grades system, a 30-point scale will be employed: failing (0 to 17) and passing (18 to 30 cum laude) grades
Type of exam
The lecturer has a duty to ensure that the rules regarding the authenticity and originality of exam tests and papers are respected. Therefore, if there is suspicion of irregular conduct, an additional assessment may be conducted, which could differ from the original exam description.
Grading scale
Maximum mark 30 (45 correct answers), minimum mark 18 (27 correct questions).
Specifically, the grades indicate
28-30L: mastery of topics covered in the lecture and appropriate technical terminology;
26-27: good knowledge of the topics covered in the lecture and, to a lesser extent, of the technical terminology;
24-25: not always thorough knowledge of the topics covered in lecture;
22-23: superficial understanding of the topics covered and poor command of technical terminology;
18-21: lacking knowledge of the topics and poor command of technical terminology.
Teaching methods
Further information
You can contact the Disability and SLD Office at disabilita@unive.it.