INTERSECTIONALITY IN POLICY, RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
- Academic year
- 2025/2026 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- INTERSECTIONALITY IN POLICY, RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
- Course code
- FM0623 (AF:578762 AR:325438)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- SPS/08
- Period
- 1st Term
- Course year
- 2
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
• Develop in-depth knowledge of feminist intersectional approaches.
• Gain an overview of their applications in research, policy-making, and social practices.
• Engage with recent publications that highlight emerging trends.
• Articulate key concepts related to intersectional approaches.
• Apply these tools in research, policy-making, and everyday professional encounters.
Pre-requirements
Contents
Throughout the semester, lectures and discussions will focus on how European legal structures, work cultures, and moralities intersect with ideas of authenticity, civil rights, and the emotional labour of people living at the crossroads of multiple marginalizations.
Case studies will include: how SOGIESC refugees negotiate and perform available queer identities; how regularized and irregular migrants engage in intimate work and sex work; how the social model of disability offers new perspectives on (dis)ability and affective shame; how housing projects and mobile aspirations interact; how ethnic/racial discrimination is resisted yet internalized; and how moral surveillance operates in digital spaces intersecting with migrant stratifications.
Referral texts
1. Week: Intersectionality and bordering
Lecture:
Anthias, F. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: an intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations: Migration and social change, 4(1), 5-20.
Yuval-Davis N, Wemyss G and Cassidy K (2017) Everyday Bordering, Belonging and the Reorientation of British Immigration Legislation. Sociology 52(2): 228-244.
Discussions:
Cristensen A and Jensen SQ (2012) Doing intersectional analysis: Implication for qualitative research. NORA, 20(2): 109-125.
Ingvars, ÁK (2023). Poetic desirability: Refugee men’s border tactics against white desire. NORMA 18(4): 277-292.
2. Week: Unfolding intersectionality in the labour economy
Lecture:
Anderson, B. (2010). Migration, Immigration Controls and the Fashioning of Precarious Workers. Work, Employment and Society 24(2), 300–17.
McDowell, L. (2008). Thinking through work: complex inequalities, construction of difference and trans-national migrants. Progress in human geography, 32(4), 491-507.
Discussions:
Dalgas, K. M. (2016). Filipino Au Pairs on the Move: Navigating strong and weak ties in the search of future paths. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6(4), 199-206.
Cherubini, D., Geymonat, G. G. & Marchetti, S. (2020). Intersectional politics on domestic workers’ rights. In E. Evans & É. Lépinard (Eds.) Intersectionality in Feminist and Queer Movements: Confronting Priviledges (pp. 238-254). London & New York: Routledge:
3. Week: Moral surveillance of SOGIESC categories
Lecture:
Hertoghs, M. & Schinkel, W. (2018). The state’s sexual desires: the performance of sexuality in the Dutch asylum procedure. Theor Soc 47, 691–716.
Adriaenssens, S., Geymonat, G. G., & Oso, L. (2016). Quality of Work in Prostitution and Sex Work. Introduction to the Special Section. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 121-132.
Discussions:
Spanger, M. (2011). Gender performances as spatial acts: (fe)male Thai migrant sex workers in Denmark. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(1), 37–52.
Ingvars, Á. (2024). Event(ual) Queer Crafting of Dublin Regulated Sogie Refugees. Italian Sociological Review, 14(9S), 341–362.
4. Week: (Dis)ability from the social perspective
Lecture:
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist Queer Crip (Introduction: Imagined Futures). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography*. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 10–21.
Discussions:
Jóhannsdóttir, Á., & Guðrúnar Ágústsdóttir, E. (2024). Complaining while disabled: Disabled people’s experiences expressing complaints within the context of sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 35(2), 172-186.
Geymonat, G.G., & Macioti, P.G. (2016). Ambivalent Professionalisation and Autonomy in Workers’ Collective
5. Week: Consumerism and digital platforms
Lecture:
Triandafyllidou, A., et al. (2023). Rethinking Migration Studies for 2050. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 22(1), 1–21.
Andersen, M., Zampoukos, K., Spanger, M., & Mitchell, D. (2024). At your service: the mobilities, rhythms and everyday lives of migrant labour in the gig economy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(15), 3733–3750.
Discussions:
Vilhjálmsson, Þ, & Ellenberger, Í.(2025). “Queer Joy, Queer Killjoy: Queerness, Nation, and Affect in the Reykjavík Pride Parade 2000–2019.” Gender, Work & Organization 32(2): 763–782.
Orth, B. (2023). Stratified pathways into platform work: Migration trajectories and skills in Berlin’s gig economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(2), 476-490.
Assessment methods
The oral exam will assess students’ understanding of the main concepts from the compulsory readings, as well as their ability to connect these to the examples and dilemmas discussed in class.
Participation in Discussions
Students are expected to complete weekly readings and actively contribute to discussions. Special care will be taken to create a safe and interactive environment that acknowledges students’ own intersectional positions. Students are encouraged to raise questions and reflections based on the readings and presentations.
Student Presentations
Each student will select one empirical study from the readings to present during the Friday discussion class. A selection sheet, starting from week 2, will be made available on Moodle at the start of the course, but beforehand students are encouraged to read well the syllabus. Presentations should last about 15 minutes and include PowerPoint slides or another visual method. Each will be followed by a brief discussion aimed at sharing critical insights and engaging with practical dilemmas.
Guidelines for constructive discussion:
• Approach all contributions with fairness and respect.
• Provide balanced feedback — neither overly lenient nor unnecessarily severe.
• Avoid responding to critique with personal retaliation.
• Treat critique as an opportunity for reflection and learning.
Type of exam
Grading scale
Teaching methods
In the Thursdays’ class, the professor will present key insights into intersectionality as they relate to the topic of the week. Slides will be uploaded before class.
In the Fridays’ class, students will present an empirical study from the readings, followed by a film screening, guest lecture, or group discussion. Each student is expected to present one article from the readings, and each presentation can include 1-2 students. To provide students time to choose an article, the professor will present the empirical cases in the first week of the course.
The aim is to critically examine how to act in complex situations as a researcher, social worker, teacher, or activist. During group discussions, the professor will introduce a real-world dilemma arising in research, policymaking, teaching, or activism. Students will then critically consider possible responses and their implications.
Further information
Classes based on teacher’s lectures will take place on Thursdays in Aula San Trovaso, between 15.45-17.15.
Classes based on student’s presentations and group discussions will take place on Fridays in Aula G1 (Polo didattico San Basilio) between 14:00-17.15, divided into three sections (see below).
Instructors:
Árdís Kristín Ingvars (ÁKI)
Office hours, Fridays between 12.00-14.00, in the room of Prof. Della Puppa, 4th floor of the Malcanton Marcorà Building, Department of Philodophy and Cultural Heritage.
Email: ardis.ingvars@unive.it; akingvars@hi.is