DATA ANALYTICS
- Academic year
- 2025/2026 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- DATA ANALYTICS
- Course code
- ET7024 (AF:595130 AR:293510)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Bachelor's Degree Programme
- Academic Discipline
- SECS-S/03
- Period
- 3rd Term
- Course year
- 2
- Where
- RONCADE
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
- To understand how to formulate a research design
- To select the correct technique for the data at hand
- To know the fundamentals of the multivariate techniques presented
- To understand the role of data analytics in the decision-making process
2. Ability to apply knowledge and understanding
- To implement the different multivariate techniques in R, from data imputation and coding to graphical representation
- Integrate secondary and primary data sources to address a business problem
3. Ability to judge:
- To develop marketing research solutions through the appropriate statistical methods
4. Communication skills
- To communicate technically
- To present the research findings in a comprehensible format ready to be used by the management in the decision-making process
5. Learning skills
- Developing statistical solutions to management puzzles
- Learning by programming in R
- Learning by doing in several different ambits of marketing research
Pre-requirements
Propaedeuticity: Probability and Statistics
Contents
a. Types of data
b. Measurement and scaling
d. Sampling
e. Types of research design
2. Data and Analysis
a. Basics of Business Analytics
b. Multivariate Analysis for Marketing Research
Referral texts
The main referral text for the methods is:
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J.Statistics for business &
economics. Cengage Learning.
Assessment methods
The written part (30 minutes) and the laboratory part (1 hour) will be held on the same day. Each question in the written part is worth 4 points, for a total of 32 points, and each exercise in the laboratory part is worth 16 points, also for a total of 32 points. To pass, students must achieve an average score of 18, conditional on a score of at least 12 points in both parts.
The code required for the exam will be provided with the exam text. Students are not expected to memorize it but must know how to apply and interpret the output.
At the end of the course, a mock exam will be held to familiarize students with the exam format
Type of exam
Grading scale
The student achieves a minimum score of 12 points in both parts, which corresponds to:
At least 4.5 correct questions in the written part.
At least one complete exercise with code and comments, plus part of another in the laboratory part.
Alternative, but not exhaustive, scenarios:
Scoring 12 points in the written part (3 correct questions) and at least 24 points in the laboratory part (2 exercises correct in terms of code).
Scoring 24 points in the written part (6 correct questions) and 12 points in the laboratory part (one exercise correct in terms of code, or two partially correct with code and comments).
B (Good - 21-26 points average)
The student exceeds the minimum requirements in A. and demonstrates a good understanding of the material by:
More than 5 correct questions in the written part.
One complete and correct laboratory exercise with code and comments, plus a significant part of a second exercise.
Alternatively, this level can be reached with an excellent performance in one part (e.g., 6+ correct answers in the written part or 2+ fully correct exercises in the laboratory part).
C (Very Good - 27-30 points average)
The student demonstrates a high level of competence by:
At least 6 correct questions in the written part.
Two fully correct laboratory exercises with code and comments.
Alternatively, this level can be reached with an excellent performance in one part of the exam, maintaining a good level in the other.
D (Excellent - 30 e Lode)
The student reaches the highest level by:
Answering all questions correctly, demonstrating excellent competence in describing the techniques in the open-ended questions.
Providing flawless code and fully accurate comments in all laboratory exercises.
This level is awarded to students who demonstrate both technical accuracy and the ability to interpret and explain results clearly.