MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY JAPANESE LITERATURE
- Academic year
- 2026/2027 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- LETTERATURA GIAPPONESE MODERNA E CONTEMPORANEA
- Course code
- LM002N (AF:742517 AR:442532)
- Teaching language
- Italian
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- ASIA-01/G
- Period
- 1st Semester
- Course year
- 1
- Where
- VENEZIA
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
The course contributes to the attainment of the teaching goals of the Corso di Laurea in the area of humanities-related skills.
In particular, this course helps students to acquire:
- A high level of critical knowledge and understanding of various socio-cultural phenomena;
- The ability to use sources and research tools related to the chosen field with competence and confidence;
- A deeper knowledge of the social realities, ways of thinking, and textual cultures of the chosen field;
- The ability to produce oral and written texts related to the field of literary studies;
- The ability to apply their knowledge to the field of literary studies.
Expected learning outcomes
- Basic knowledge of theoretical and methodological tools related to the study of modern literature;
- In-depth knowledge of Japanese historical and literary phenomena that can be understood through such theories and methods;
Applying of knowledge and understanding:
- Ability to apply the theoretical and methodological tools acquired in the first part of the course to individual phenomena in the field of modern Japanese literature;
- Ability to recognize the application of such tools in previous scholarship;
- Ability to read and analyze literary texts written in 20th-century Japan.
Communication:
- Summarize and communicate the gist of scholarly texts in a formally correct and effective manner, either orally or in writing.
Making judgments:
- To be able to examine available sources and identify their arguments and assumptions;
Pre-requirements
- Willingness to read materials in advance and to participate in seminar classes;
- Ability to read primary and secondary sources in apanese.
A basic knowledge of literary Japanese ("bungo") is desirable but not required.
Contents
Course topic: TBA
The course might include some lectures by invited scholars specializing in the field.
Referral texts
Assessment methods
Assessment focuses on the ability to critically analyze the topics covered during the course, on bibliographic research, on adherence to academic standards, and on the quality of the organization of the discourse.
During the oral exam, questions will be asked to evaluate the achievement of the expected learning outcomes of the course.
Type of exam
The lecturer has a duty to ensure that the rules regarding the authenticity and originality of exam tests and papers are respected. Therefore, if there is suspicion of irregular conduct, an additional assessment may be conducted, which could differ from the original exam description.
Grading scale
A 30L grade is awarded to students who excel in all areas of evaluation. The paper is characterized by:
• Theme and texts: An original and well-argued choice of topic, with texts that are consistent and relevant to the course. The analysis is thorough, critical, and highly developed.
• Bibliographic research: Independent and rigorous research with top-tier academic sources, including peer-reviewed articles and monographs. The sources are correctly contextualized.
• Style manual: Flawless adherence to citation and formatting rules. The paper is free from grammatical and syntactical errors.
• Historical and literary context: The analysis effectively contextualizes the text within both the author’s body of work and the broader landscape of contemporary Japanese literature, offering critical and in-depth insight.
Grade 27-29
Students with a grade between 27 and 29 produce well-developed papers but with minor shortcomings:
• Theme and texts: The theme is relevant, but the analysis might not be entirely original or lack deep critical reflection.
• Bibliographic research: The research is good but may lack an optimal selection of sources or full integration of key academic materials.
• Style manual: Adherence to academic conventions is generally good, but there may be minor errors in citations or formatting.
• Historical and literary context: Adequate contextualization, but not fully in-depth regarding the author or contemporary Japanese literary scene.
Grade 24-26
A grade between 24 and 26 corresponds to a satisfactory paper with notable shortcomings:
• Theme and texts: The theme is generally relevant, but the analysis is superficial or imprecise. Coherence with the course material is acceptable, but the work lacks deep critical engagement.
• Bibliographic research: The research is partial, with sources that are not always suitable or well-integrated into the analysis.
• Style manual: There are noticeable errors in adherence to academic conventions, such as incomplete citations or inconsistencies in formatting.
• Historical and literary context: The contextualization is partial or imprecise, with limited understanding of the author’s context and the broader Japanese literary scene.
Grade 18-23
A grade between 18 and 23 indicates a paper that meets the minimum course requirements but with significant shortcomings:
• Theme and texts: The theme is superficial or not entirely relevant. The analysis of the texts is incomplete and not well-developed.
• Bibliographic research: The research is insufficient, with inadequate or absent sources, and the sources used are not well integrated into the paper.
• Style manual: There are numerous errors in citations and formatting, with little attention to academic writing standards.
• Historical and literary context: The contextualization is limited, with few references to the historical context and contemporary Japanese literary scene.
Grade 17 and Below
A grade of 17 or below is given to papers that do not meet the minimum requirements:
• Theme and texts: The chosen topic is irrelevant or off-topic. The analysis is disorganized and lacks coherence.
• Bibliographic research: The research is insufficient, with low-quality sources or no sources at all.
• Style manual: The paper contains numerous errors in citation, formatting, and language. There are frequent grammatical and syntactical mistakes.
• Historical and literary context: The contextualization is almost entirely absent or incorrect, with little understanding of the historical and literary context.