AMERICAN LITERATURE 1 MOD. 1
- Academic year
- 2026/2027 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- AMERICAN LITERATURE 1 MOD. 1
- Course code
- LMJ260 (AF:744021 AR:444101)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- ANGL-01/B
- Period
- 1st Semester
- Course year
- 1
- Where
- VENEZIA
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
1) to develop an in-depth knowledge and understanding of key works of Californian American literature between the 1800s and the 2000s;
2) the ability to apply this knowledge and understanding to other texts;
3) the development of advanced skills in communicating the content studied in English;
4) the ability to discuss and evaluate primary and secondary materials with relative autonomy;
5) the ability to work synergistically with other students.
Pre-requirements
Contents
Referral texts
1. Helen Hunt Jackson, Ramona (1884), ch 1, 2, 3, 6
2. Mary H. Austin, The Land of Little Rain (1901), ch 1, 12; "The Indivisible Utility" (1925)
3. Upton Sinclair, Oil! (1927), ch 1, 4
4. Chinatown (R. Polanski, 1974) movie
5. John Fante, Ask the Dust (1939), full novel
6. Mary Oyama, “After Pearl Harbor: Los Angeles” (Common Ground, 1942)
7. Hisaye Yamamoto, “Wilshire Bus,” 1950 (Seventeen Syllables and Other Stories, 1988)
8. Lawrence Ferlinghetti, “Salton Sea Notes,” 1961 (Writing Across the Landscape: Travel Journals 1960-2013)
9. Black Panthers, 10 Point Program, 1966
10. Elaine Castillo, America is Not the Heart (2018), full novel
11. Joan Didion, “Holy Water” (Esquire, 1977)
12. Natalie Diaz, “The First Water is the Body” (Postcolonial Love Poem, 2020)
Secondary sources (all in Moodle, except for Anderson):
Sigrid Anderson, “Introduction”, in Land of Sunshine: Race, Gender, and Regional Development in a California Periodical (U. of Nebraska P., 2024), pp. 1-28. --> Unive Library (BALI)
Mike Davis, “Sunshine or Noir”, in City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (Verso, 1999), pp. 17-70.
Nicholas Witschi, “’I Know What is Best for You’: Post-Howellsian Realism in Mary Austin’s Desert Narratives”, in Traces of Gold: California’s Natural Resources and the Claim to Realism in Western American Literature (U. of Alabama Press, 2001), pp. 111-138.
Pierre Lagayette, “California in Late Settlement”, in The Cambridge Companion of the Literature of the West (ed. S. Frye, Cambridge UP, 2016) pp. 73-88.
David Fine, “The Twenties and Beyond: Oil, Movies and Salvation,” in Imagining Los Angeles: A City in Fiction (U. of Nevada Press), pp. 53-62.
Daniel Gardner “A Ramona in Reverse: Writing the Madness of the Spanish Past in Ask the Dust”, in John Fante’s Ask the Dust: A Joining of Voices and Views (eds. S. Cooper, C. Donato, Fordham UP, 2020), pp. 83-115.
Nicolangelo Becce, “Introduction” (1.2; 1.3) , in The Internment Ordeal in a Post-Truth World: Contemporary Narratives of the Japanese American Incarceration (De Gruyter, 2026), pp. 15-27.
James Sobredo, “From Manila Bay to Daly City: Filipinos in San Francisco”, in Reclaiming San Francisco: History, Politics, Culture (eds. J. Brook, C. Carlsson, N. Peters, City Lights Books, 1998), pp. 273-286.
Non-mandatory secondary sources (Moodle):
Matthew S. Henry, “Introduction”, in Hydronarratives: Water, Environamental Justice, and a Just Transition (U. of Nebraska P., 2022), pp. 1-23
Mike Davis, “The Dialectic of Ordinary Disaster”, in Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster (Metropolitan Books 1998), pp. 5-55.
Assessment methods
Primary and secondary sources are mandatory.
PAY ATTENTION: YOU MUST HAVE THE TEXTS, EITHER PRINTED OR IN A DIGITAL FORMAT, DURING THE ORAL INTERVIEW
Type of exam
The instructor is responsible for ensuring the authenticity and originality of all examinations and coursework. In cases of suspected academic misconduct, an additional on-site assessment may be required during the exams, which may differ from the standard format.
Grading scale
A. range 18-22: sufficient content knowledge; limited ability to discuss independently, limited knowledge of theoretical tools, limited knowledge of cultural-historical context and debates.
B. range 23-26: fair content knowledge; fair independent discussion skills, fair knowledge of theoretical tools, fair knowledge of cultural-historical context and debates.
C. range 27-29: good content knowledge; good independent discussion skills, good knowledge of theoretical tools, good knowledge of historical-cultural context and debates.
D. 30: very good content knowledge, independent discussion skills and very good knowledge of the theoretical tools; very good knowledge of the historical-cultural context and debates.
D. Honors/cum laude: awarded in case the knowledge of contents, the independent discussion skills, the knowledge of theoretical tools, of the cultural-historical context and of the debates are excellent and the student expands what is required by the course syllabus
Teaching methods
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals
This subject deals with topics related to the macro-area "Climate change and energy" and contributes to the achievement of one or more goals of U. N. Agenda for Sustainable Development